Nick Leverton wrote: > How wide-reaching are your UDN fixes, would it be worth thinking about > getting them into the package soon ? > Its only a few lines of code that mainly involves creating a UDN table while parsing gatedesc.xml and check against the entire table entries. Problem is that the actual code parse only the first UDN and use it for validating all requests. With the gatedesc.xml given as an example it works but if you put several including a different in the device sections it fails. Try putting 3 different UDN and see how it fails.
The UPNP validation test tools (upnp.org igd- tools available to UPnP forum members) requires different UDN or gives an error eraly. BTW/ my plan are to be able to run the entire test suite and fixe at least what we want to function. Three are some functions we explicitely want to disable so if I find an error, it will be at the end of my todio list. Do you have plan to make upnp-igd compatible with 1.8? I looked at the chnages and it mostly renders the structure opaques forcing you to use access function for all structure fields. I can probably do it but it will just slow me down... -- eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
