Martin Godisch wrote: > I would not like that, but I guess it is the correct solution when no > other kernel is available anymore. But maybe you should wait a bit to > see whether acpi is adjusting to the kernel's new interface and will > provide the files in /proc again.
/proc/acpi is provided by the kernel, it seems unlikely they will re-add the power information to it. > > I am *not* going to try to deal with the kernel's new power reporting > > scheme myself. > > I can understand that. Does it imply that you wouldn't accept a patch? Yes, I have no real desire to keep such a patch working as the kernel interfaces continue to churn. While hal basically sucks, at least its interface is stable. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
