On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:32:35 +0200, Harka Jinen wrote: (Please cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on replies.)
> >> > 2. More importantly, 'minimal' should in all likelihood be 'maximum'. > > I'm not so sure about that point. RFC 2109 [0] says in "6.3 > > Implementation limits": > > * at least 4096 bytes per cookie (as measured by the size of the > > characters that comprise the cookie non-terminal in the > > syntax description of the Set-Cookie header) [..] > OK, I'll take your word for it. But the package description sounds > very contradictory in that case. I'd suggest changing it to avoid that > impression. Right, the description is really a bit confusing and has room for improvement. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Funny van Dannen: Mütter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
