On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:38:43AM -0700, Larry Doolittle wrote: > Repeating the original (2008-04-28) table:
> 3.0.28a-1 3.2.0~pre1-1 > libtalloc1 0 84 > libwbclient0 0 136 > libsmbclient 2320 3808 > samba-common 6944 10928 > smbclient 12528 24568 > ------------------------------------------- > total 21792 39524 > and the new (2008-07-21) status (included in my > mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but not shown > by default on the bug status web page): > 2:3.0.31-1 2:3.2.0-3 > libtalloc1 0 84 > libwbclient0 0 136 > libsmbclient 2348 3876 > samba-common 7036 11116 > smbclient 12704 25628 > ------------------------------------------- > total 22088 40840 > All numbers are for Architecture: amd64. > My hope is that there is some systematic cause that can > be fixed, and that there is not just general bloat and > scope creep in the code between 3.0 and 3.2 branches. I'm afraid that it is probably a question of code bloat. The samba codebase has never had a very rigorous division between client and server code, for instance, so there's probably a fair amount of code duplicated in the executables that isn't actually needed there. I've already ruled out the possibility that a failure to strip the executables was to blame here, which is the only systematic cause I can think of. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
