On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:08:56AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > > > Ok, so here are two patches. One of them using recipes-x86, and the other > > simply modifiing recipes. > > > > The first one expects recipes-x86 has been created previously via "svn > > copy". > > So is either of these okay?
Hi folks, I don't want to be annoying, but I really think this should be sorted out in time for lenny. Not doing so will mean that boot will be less robust; for example if one does: mkdir /tmp/boot mv /boot/* /tmp/boot/ cp -a /tmp/boot/* /boot/ on a system where core.img was embedded, nothing will happen. OTOH if you do the same on a system where core.img was referenced via blocklists, boot will start crashing as soon as the (now free) blocks that held the old core.img are overwritten. -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What good is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
