On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:15:25PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > James Vega wrote: > > I'll keep this on my radar though, since this is actually something that I > > dislike about the upstream packaging anyway. > > I'm not really sure what upstream's options are, apart from simply dropping > the feedparser.py file.
That's exactly the option I'm considering. Documenting the plugin dependencies (and guarding the imports) instead of actually shipping the 3rd-party libs with Supybot. > Can't the Debian packaging simply symlink it from the python-feedparser > package? This is containing a growing number of patches relative to upstream. There currently aren't any patches against the upstream source so I'm not sure what you're referring to here. N.B., I'm also Supybot's upstream. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
