At 01 Aug 2008 10:09:21 -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
>
> Greetings, and thanks for the feedback! WOuld you mind excerpting the
> C routines corresponding to the two 'no' results below, compile with
> -g and run under gdb to let me know where they fail? I am surprised
> at the failure.
>
> Specifically, what is wrong with
>
> void gprof_cleanup() {};
> int main(int argc,char *argv[],char *envp[]) {
> #include "h/unrandomize.h"
> return 0;}
>
> when compiled and run in the topdir of gcl source?
Hi All;
I changed the debian bug followup to the GCL bug about sbrk; hope that
makes sense. More context can be found in debian bug #474909
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=474909
The short answer to your question is no :-).
I have the strangest situation:
If I run './debian/rules build' then the configure completes
successfully, and the build completes (although the test results at
the end look pretty disastrous). Build log (i386,
linux-image-2.6.25-2-686 2.6.25-7) is at
http://www.cs.unb.ca/~bremner/logs/2008/08/02/rules-build.log.gz
I am currently building gcl 2.6.7-40 in various permutations of environments,
but based on the Changlelog I don't expect big differences.
All the best,
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
