Hi Dirk, thanks for the comment.
Purging is not an option -- we are transitioning people on up to 300 machines. However, it seems that neither mpich-bin nor lam-runtime currently (as of lenny) use the 'mpiexec' alternatives class. Instead, they register a class 'mpirun' only. Did I miss something? Cheers, Alex Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Manuel brought up the possible issue with symmetry, or lack thereof, > regarding MPICH. I personally switched to using orterun as the frontend, or > even slurm's tools, so I can't really comment. > > Further, lam is not all that actively managed inside Debian and upstream, so > I would simply suggest to make the problem go away ... by purging lam. Is > that an option for you? > > Dirk > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
