On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 01:16:43PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008, Eric Pozharski wrote: > > Excuse me a bit of speculation. If my understanding of Debian > > Policy is correct than B<x11-utils> package in state of B<7.3+2> (in > > sid) violates it. However (at moment of writing this) no one *SKIP* > I think policy might need an update; it would be nice if you could > pick up this task.
B<You>? I hope that B<you> is plural. Look, despite the fact that my F</etc/issue> says my system is B<lenny/sid> in fact it's far from it. Right now, that B<will> be a PITA for me to attempt to fix Debian Policy. (I have a rule -- If I can't provide patch, I won't complain. In case of DP, the patch is unavailable.) > The Xorg maintainers brought #440830 to my attention, where Russ > mentions dak and policy; dak must obviously support this or x11-utils > wouldn't be in the archive, but policy might still not be up-to-date > in this respect. One more point that I picked right package to bugreport. *CUT* -- Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
