Hi, putting back the bug in the loop, so my fellow pkg-phototools comaintainers (which includes enblend people) have a chance to read you.
Ben Pearre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21/08/2008): > Thanks for your fast response, especially given that you have reason > to believe that this is just a dumb-user-support issue. So sorry for > the obnoxious wording, but I don't yet see how README.Debian addresses > this issue: it does not mention enfuse at all. You said: > More info on enfuse at http://wiki.panotools.org/Enfuse Quoting it: > State of development > Enfuse is currently in beta and available with the development version > of Enblend So, yes, README.Debian could be improved, but the essential info is there already. Ben Pearre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21/08/2008): > It sounds like you might be saying that the hugin version in Unstable > is configured for a more recent version of some supporting software > than appears in Unstable, and it is OK for it not to work while some > other maintainers play catch-up. No, while Hugin/Enblend/Enfuse people haven't released their software. > I hope I misunderstand, as that seems to break the whole point of > versioned dependencies, doesn't it? Key point: hugin, as shipped > rignt now, doesn't work. That's a bug, right? Some features aren't available, including exposure-related because enfuse (aka. enblend 3.1) isn't released yet. Snapshots are being tested, I think, but last time I checked, CVS head has been broken for days, maybe weeks. So we couldn't really package a snapshot either. I think upstream reverted the offending patch, as well as people in charge of packaging it. I guess they might follow-up to that bug with status update. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
