On fre, 2008-08-29 at 11:43 +0200, Andreas Unterkircher wrote: > But I do not know if it is so wise to remove that "feature" that > silently? Maybe I'm not the only one relying on that.
Silently? Didn't you get a big fat error message? Silent breakage was what the original commit I pointed you to fixed. inet_aton supports the ancient classful address format, but this does not include the 10/8 format so you would have to settle for 10.0/8. I'll post a patch in a second asking upstream to consider it. I'm not prepared to carry this in the debian package if upstream doesn't pick it up, specially since it doesn't restore full backwards compatibility and the usefullness of the "feature" is doubtful. Going back to the home-made parser would be even worse, since it's known to be broken. -- Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
