On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:29:19AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 05:40:32PM -0700, Houou Rinne wrote:
> > I'm certain that I'm using the rt2500 driver. I have the rt2500pci driver 
> > blacklisted do to its issues. I'm using WPA-PSK authentication. In case 
> > this is my fault and my setup is wrong here is what my interfaces file 
> > looks like.
>  
> OK, I've been through the changes in CVS and there are some obvious
> changes to make WPA work under 2.6.26 which we should be able to apply.

...except that the wireless event changes I was looking at are actually
for 2.6.27 or the Fedora 10 kernel.  So I don't see any changes that
look like they could explain this.

Is it possible that the interface might be configured differently when
you use different versions of the driver?  Does the interface name
change?  (The Debian package uses a prefix of "eth", following the old
convention for wireless Ethernet interfaces, whereas the original Ralink
and Serialmonkey versions use "ra".  udev may override this based by
remembering the association between MAC address and interface name.)

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. - Harrison

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to