On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 02:46:26PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > I monkey-patched it to cover x86_64 as well, and it works well for me:
Do you have an example where it makes a difference on x86_64? It shouldn't; GCC defaults to -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on x86_64 (it's an ABI requirement), and that's much better than this. The patch needs to be posted upstream. If gnats is broken (we're in the process of ditching it), I suggest just posting it to gdb-patches. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
