On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:32:13AM +0000, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi, > > while looking at our RC bugs, I discovered this one and thought I could > fix it by loosing the Dependency on llvm-dev to >= ${source:Version}, > but after looking at the package, I wondered if the Dependency is > needed at all. > The package contains only example sourcecode, which I would understand > as a kind of documentation. The code is still readable and > understandable without the llvm-dev package (even if not complileable).
> Thus I think llvm-examples should only recommend llvm-dev without > any version (or does llvm break it's API with every release?). It does. Or at least often. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgp9Ex3e9sREn.pgp
Description: PGP signature