On Friday 03 October 2008 19:02, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course, even more preferable would be if people designing standards > would not expect users to change the ways they sign messages (l=) based > on whether it's going to be sent to a list or not as the only way to > accommodate common existing practices.
I challenge you to design a way of signing messages that doesn't have this issue. I can't think of a better way of doing this, and I am really interested to hear any proposals of better ways of doing it. Last time I checked DKIM wasn't finalised so you can suggest changes to it... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
