reopen 311990 thanks Clay Lenhart writes: > Although the ps is correct, I believe the information is incorrect. > > The second subkey should read: > 1024R/3C6C33E8 rather than 1024g/3C6C33E8 > > below is the output of "gpg --list-sigs" > $ gpg --list-sigs [EMAIL PROTECTED] > pub 1024D/B40024C9 2002-10-19 [expires: 2009-10-01] > uid Clay Lenhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > sig 3 B40024C9 2004-10-02 Clay Lenhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > sub 1024R/3C6C33E8 2004-10-02 [expires: 2009-10-01] > sig B40024C9 2004-10-02 Clay Lenhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
So we should just remove that subkey from our output. Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
