Hi, thanks for the quick reply.
Marcus Better wrote: >> for libjdom-java to go (#502500), you need to update jta to not depend >> on that. > It's been fixed in jta 2.6+dfsg-1.1 (see #502344). Good. That hadn't made it into the archive proper just yet but will right now, so libjdom-java should be gone by tomorrow. Note that you'll have to talk to the release team about letting the two reverse dependencies (jta and statcvs) migrate before libjdom-java gets removed from there as well. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
