also sprach Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.11.01.0036 +0100]:
> Do you know whether upstream would be willing to maintain the doc
> in the future in formats other that .txt files? Don't worry I'm
> not thinking neither at docbook-xml, nor at *roff :) ... still,
> I'm willing to do the initial step of converting them into, say,
> POD, which is quite close to text but permits to generate the
> manpage structure.
> 
> Still, that would be pointless (and I wont do that) unless
> upstream is willing to stay stick with that format, whatever it
> will be.

Petr, could you please answer this?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
EARTH
      smog | bricks
 AIR  --  mud  -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
         WATER

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)

Reply via email to