-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:30:39PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 23:23 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:09:18PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> >Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>[...]
>> >> Any hint on looking up reverse build-dependencies somehow?
>> >
>> >dak rm -Rn -s testing ghostscript|grep build-dependency|grep 
>> >gs-common
>> 
>> Thanks, but...
>> 
>> I suspect I need to run that command on a Debian host (unlike 
>> rmadison) right?
>> 
>> Which host - I tried debian.org (gluck) and alioth.debian.org but 
>> none of them have dak installed.
>
>merkel has a projectb (the dak database) mirror and a copy of dak.

Thanks!

This revealed 33 packages currently build-depending on gs-common:

autoclass
bacula-doc
cdbs
cl-yacc
dejagnu
dieharder
doc-debian-es
flite
fpc
freepops
geda-symbols
graphviz
ijs
ivritex
kmymoney2
latex-mk
log4c
magnus
multimix
musixtex-slurps
numerix
opensched
pmx
proxy-suite
snort
texpower
thailatex
tipa
transfig
wordnet
xen-3
xorp
ifeffit/contrib

...in addition to the (now verified) 3 packages depending on gs-common:

page-crunch
latex-make
zope-textindexng3


Build-dependencies ignore recommends. So it seems we cannot avoid at 
least one circular dependency if dealing with this issue by having 
ghostscript depend on gs-common.


If someone could check those build-dependencies for possible need of 
the X11 driver, we can at least get rid of one circular dependency, and 
avoid forcing X11 on all ghostscript users for the next 2 release 
cycles.


  - Jonas

- -- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkQ1i8ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgpHACdFo8jaFrFwT6lJlFp92ZB6k1T
qv8AnRoe+yDlr28BTggYijruiA3seVTa
=3hon
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to