Package: python-scientific
Version: 2.4.11-2
Severity: normal

Docstrings are built in to modules written in C, but guarded
incorrectly (probably, it's a question of python version
compatibility).

Example:
$ pydoc Scientific.IO.NetCDF
shows no documentation at all, however there are lots of
docstrings within the file.

Possible fix:
$ grep -rl pythondoc $root | xargs sed -i 's/pythondoc/pydoc/g'

It is possible that I misunderstood the meaning of the test for
docstring and it should be changed from
        'pythondoc' in sys.modules
to
        'pythondoc' in sys.modules or 'pydoc' in sys.modules

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages python-scientific depends on:
ii  python                        2.5.2-2    An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-central                0.6.7      register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python-netcdf                 2.4.11-2   A netCDF interface for Python
ii  python-numeric-ext            24.2-9     Extension modules for Numeric Pyth
ii  python2.5                     2.5.2-6    An interactive high-level object-o

Versions of packages python-scientific recommends:
ii  python-tk                     2.5.2-1    Tkinter - Writing Tk applications 

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to