Package: linux-image-2.6.24-openmoko-gta02 Version: 20080903.git2ea34171-2 Severity: important User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: package-creation
Hi there! This discussion started at [1]. On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:25:39 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Freitag, den 07.11.2008, 23:03 -0500 schrieb Stefan Monnier: >> > I think the rationale is that all features of the kernel should be >> > available. We could group and separate them into packages if it >> > becomes an issue. This would be a problem when we will go for a stock Debian kernel. >> Actually, looking at it again, it seems that the set of modules >> provided by the Om kernels is pretty much the same, >> but each *.ko file is about 10 times smaller. Not sure what's going >> on here. Could be something to do with something like >> versioned-identifiers, or some other global compilation option for >> the kernel. > > Gismo, I guess you might know something about that? Maybe some "-g" > parameter parameter or a call to "strip" that’s missing? I have not checked yet, but you are probably right: IIRC we do not strip anything and instead we just call make to build the kernel. I guess that the switch to kernel-package will solve this issue as well. Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca Footnotes: [1] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/smartphones-userland/2008-November/000391.html -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: armel (armv4tl) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-20080903.git2ea34171 (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.24-openmoko-gta02 depends on: ii module-init-tools 3.4-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo linux-image-2.6.24-openmoko-gta02 recommends no packages. linux-image-2.6.24-openmoko-gta02 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
pgpzfAtJC9MqB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
