Hi, ehh.. forgotten to write about this one:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:09:09PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > - demonstrate --check --pedantic failing due to invalid first line > (ensure it still processes following ones -- should it warn > about each? or just the first?) I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I wonder which behaviour would be the best: Process every line without stopping on the first invalid line or Process every line until one invalid line is found (like it is implemented currently). From your sentence I guess you'd prefer the first? Is this a strong requirement in order for the patch to be included into coreutils? Otherwise I'd like to hear the submitters opinion as well. Best Regards, Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
