-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sandro Tosi schrieb:
> Hello Patrick,
> all your conversation went unnoticed to be due to use of -quite and
> -submitter, so only now I see your patch.
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 20:04, Patrick Matthäi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I have noexec on /tmp and /var/tmp, but AFAIK that is not suposed to
>>> break anything policy-wise.
>
> mh, even if I still don't understand how --oknodo fix the problem, I
> may think to add it.
>
>> noexec breaks for example debconf in some situations.
>
> So, aren't we working around a problem on the user system? I think
> many uses noexec on some partitions, so that's weird what's happening
> only on the user's system and not on all the other box.
That is in my eyes the problem, you and myself can not reproduce this
bug, but it fixed this behaviour on the reporters system.
Anyway if he just has {/var}/tmp mounted noexec it would not break the
startup.
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkksVK0ACgkQ2XA5inpabMed8gCeOvOFXrSwy3wmXNX+SAkLbjZ1
4f0An1V9QZEsX3IgCG01bTQ9I5+O5d9s
=uE8A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]