On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 09:28:10PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:42:20PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:10:55PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > The copy in the DDP CVS seems indeed to be outdated. > > > > > > Should that be updated or should we use the package? > > > > The current upstream is in svn.debian.org. > > > > The question is how to update this. > > > > One idea is to change CVS contents so the Makefile does: > > * Check out SVN content. > > * Build it instead of trying to change CVS data. > > That sounds evil. In this case I think I would prefer further manual > syncs or directly checking out the svn by a webmaster. > > We can't use the files from the binary package?
Yes, we can. (Obama's style is not intended :-) But : 1/ apt-howto package has been removed from the archiven, because the author considers the Debian reference as a better replacment (see #493787), so only the etch package can be used. 2/ that *were* binary packages, since there is one binary per language. Should we : 1/ syncrhonize the last version of apt-howto, on the website, and mark it as deprecated ? 2/ delete it from the website ? Feedback appreciated. -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
