On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 17:43 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 16:55 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > Hi again, > > > > > > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > I don't think the RMs will want to have one transition where Fortran > > > > stuff, > > > > OOo etc. will wait for such a package rename.... > > > > > > We already had that "fun", fwiw, you can ask -release :-) > > > > Heh, I recognize that oo-calc depends on lp-solve (maybe it shouldn't > > and instead use glpk?). > > That's not in my hands. Kohei used liblpsolve for his Solver and Sun > does that too after they refused to take Koheis.
well rather off topic, but IMHO ``best'' linear open source solver is clp, followed by glpk followed by maybe lpsolve. > > Anyway, if no one can rely on the .so I don't see a reason why the .so > > openoffice.org-calc does ;-) Argh, but then I don't understand how openoffice.org-calc uses a clean upgrade path. I mean it depends on lp-solve (>= 5.5.0.10-10) so if future versions of liblpsolve55.so break api/abi it will just crash... I am asking as I am searching for a way to do the same with shogun. Soeren -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
