[Guido Günther]
> This looks like overkill and just reduces the readability. Wouldn't
> it be better if the the lsb log_* functions would look at an env var
> (LSB_VERBOSE or similar)?

I believe each script writer need to decide on a per message basis if
the message should be visible when VERBOSE=no (or kernel option quiet)
is used, and thus believe it is the wrong approach to move the test to
the log_* functions.  The skeleton example just happen to believe all
its messages should be hidden in quiet mode.

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to