On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:46:17 +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > We have an ugly "fix" for it in the script (the loop that waits for > /dev/zap/ctl), but it's, well, ugly. udevsettle indeed seems like a much > better idea. It will require more testing and thus I'll check it > upstream.
Are we still talking about /etc/init.d/zaptel? I don't see a loop. And no mention of 'ctl' either (1:1.4.11~dfsg-3). 'udevsettle' vs. 'udevadm settle': The NEWS-entry for udev version 126 mentions: No symlinks to udevadm are installed anymore, if they are still needed, they should be provided by the package. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=blob;f=NEWS So. 'udevadm settle' should be the future-proof way if you or upstream decide to go that way. > I have already commited a fix to the other issue you mentioned, which is > a minor issue with very minor risk, just in case we get to upload a new > version of this package. Yes. There's definately no hurry there. I just saw it by accident that the function name was misspelled when I included the 'udevsettle' in the script after the upgrade to -3. Didn't even know there was a 'status' function before that :-) -- I came, I saw, I deleted all your files. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]