tags 508606 - patch thanks Hi Tuomas, On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 01:45:42AM +0200, Tuomas Jormola wrote: > I think that it would be better to split virsh out from libvirt-bin to > its own packge. Reasoning being libvirtd works fine without local virsh I was thinkging about this too but spitting out a single binary looks a bit like overkill. If we go down this path we should at also rename libvirt-bin to libvirtd and create a libvirt-bin transitional package but I'm still not convinced splitting out virsh buys us much. You can always disable libvirtd. Cheers, -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
