On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Mike Hommey <gland...@debian.org> wrote: > reopen 419746 > thanks > > Hi Bryan, > > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:29:27AM -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote: >> On 5/6/07, Gustavo Franco <stra...@debian.org> wrote: >>> Hi Bryan, >>> >>> Just found your experimental package and I've tried to build it from >>> source for my ppc laptop since you've used architecture: any into >>> debian/control. I think you should replace it with i386, amd64, >>> sparc64 because it FTBFS on non i386, amd64 or sparc64 machines. See >>> my build output below: >> >> Thanks for the info, I'll update them shortly. >> >> For those following the bug but not the zfs-fuse list, i386 and source >> packages are at http://www.fushizen.net/zfs-fuse/ > > Are you still interested in maintaining zfs-fuse for Debian? I see your > repository only has old versions of zfs-fuse and I already packaged > 0.5.0 for my own needs based on your packages. > > It's not quite in proper shape to be included in Debian, but I am > willing to do that work. It you are still interested in maintaining > zfs-fuse, maybe we could setup a team on alioth? > > What do you think?
Hi, I'm not /not/ interested, but at the moment I don't have a spare drive to do testing on... Feel free to use my old packages as a base though. Thanks, Bryan Donlan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
