Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jan 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >> Package: dpkg >> Version: 1.14.24 >> Severity: minor >> >> Only dpkg, dpkg-dev and dselect have these fields. Why are they? > > They are samples and correspond to the expected default values of those > fields. They do not hurt and I wonder why you felt the need to report this > when we have them for _many_ years already. Well, entries for all packages have N fields, and every field holds some additional info about a package. In this situation, I just don't understand what additional info these fields holds. If you disagree, then please turn this into wishlist and/or wontfix.
-- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com Ukrainian C++ Developer, Debian Maintainer, APT contributor
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
