On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:50:48 +0100 (CET) "Thijs Kinkhorst" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: smarty > Version: 2.6.20-1.1 > Severity: minor > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > Dear Neil, > > You've added a NEWS.Debian item to Smarty with the following text: > > The smarty logo is trademarked and has been removed. Before > including the smarty logo in your own website(s), ensure you > read[...] > > If the logo is removed from the package, why are we telling users which > rules to follow before including the logo on their website? We don't ship > it, if they download it from the internet they should make sure themselves > that they understand the licence, right? I added the note simply because other parts of the package refer to the logo - including advice that the smarty logo can be freely included in websites using smarty. As the logo was previously shipped, I felt it useful to counter the advice in the rest of the package to clarify the situation from a Debian perspective, without making the removal of the logo into a larger change across other files. Is the News item a nuisance? -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ http://e-mail.is-not-s.ms/
pgpPFi8Vynl0M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
