clone 486369 -1 retitle -1 tex-common: teTeX-specific code should be removed thanks
While cleaning up old e-mails still marked as "do something!"... Frank Hilmar Preusse <[email protected]> wrote: > On 15.06.08 Frank Küster ([email protected]) wrote: > >> Package: tex-common >> Version: 1.10 >> Severity: normal >> >> For example: >> >> ,---- update-texmf(8) >> | SEE ALSO >> | Further information can be found in >> /usr/share/doc/tetex-bin/README.Debian.gz >> | >> `---- >> > Which leads me to the questtion, what we still need. > > - debian/postinst.in reads: > > This file is no longer used and has therefore been renamed by the > postinst script of the tetex-base package. > -> keep > > Further down it checks the old teTeX texmf-tree: > > check_texmf /etc/texmf/texmf.d/05TeXMF.cnf TEXMFDIST \ > > '/usr/share/texmf-{tetex,texlive}|/usr/share/texmf-{texlive,tetex}|/usr/share/texmf-texlive' > check_texmf /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf TEXMFDIST \ > > '/usr/share/texmf-{tetex,texlive}|/usr/share/texmf-{texlive,tetex}|/usr/share/texmf-texlive' > > As tex-common conflicts with tetex-base that dirs should be gone, > when we come to this part of the installation. > > - debian/preinst.in should be cleaned after etch as it might be > needed for upgrade > - in debian/common.functions.in some functions have "tetex" in the > name and a lot of md5sums from old teTeX files, but this does not > hurt > - /usr/share/texmf-tetex/ is still listed in the Policy and the > package tetex-bin is listed > - same for doc/TeX-on-Debian.sgml > - update-updmap.1 and update-texmf.8 (see above) > - tpm2licenses(.README) > > H. > -- > sigmentation fault -- Frank Küster Debian Developer (TeXLive) VCD Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg, ADFC Miltenberg B90/Grüne KV Miltenberg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
