On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 06:18:38PM +0000, Philip Martin wrote: > Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> writes: > > > I'm guessing you're saying that libtool-doc should still conflict > > with libtool1.4-doc? I don't agree. libtool1.4-doc is only > > part of oldstable. You should not be using it anymore in stable. > > No. I had libtool and libtool-doc 1.5 installed when I upgraded > libtool to 2.2 using aptitude. When I did this libtool-doc didn't get > upgraded and is still at version 1.5. I think that's a bug: the 1.5 > libtool-doc package should either have been removed or upgraded. [...] > I still think it's a bug that I have out-of-date libtool-doc > installed.
I assume you did something like "aptitude install libtool/experimental", and expected libtool-doc to also be upgraded? libtool-doc is only a Suggests. Maybe a Recommends would have different behaviour, I don't know. But it might also be related that it's still in experimental and that it default to only take from experimental what you tell it to take from experimental. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
