Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear Hadmut, > > > could you propose a solution for how this problem can be solved? > > As Stefan pointed out this procedure seems to be common practice. But I > can understand you also. It was not clear for me in the beginning, how > wwsympa was served by the HTTP server. > > Does someone of you know, what would be the right place to ask such > questions or is there some Debian policy dealing with this issue. > > For the time being, would a warning that this file is added with the > implications suffice? > > > Thanks, > > Paul
My proposal to provide a simple solution would be to provide a configuration file with all directives commented out and asking the admin within the configuration process to uncomment (or modify) the file, let him confirm that he has read that hint. regards Hadmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
