I've changed the severity of this to wishlist because, IMO, that's
precisely what it is.

I understand and don't necessarily disagree with these suggestions; to
that end, I have opened a SourceForge RFE.

With that said, I'm not entirely convinced that dkim-filter is the place
to solve these issues. Off the top of my head, using the l= tag to work
around listserv munging breaks if any multipart/alternative components
of a list message are not text/plain, for example.

In the meantime, while the listservs of the world are updated to
properly support re-signing messages (which I agree will not happen
overnight), the proposed ADSP extension does give you, as a sender, some
input into this (all vs. discardable; see
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-08#section-4.2.1).

-- 
Mike Markley <m...@markley.org>



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to