> In other words: Anyone not installing a "Recommends" > accepts a small breakage. In this case the breakage is "not > working menu items". Not good, but "unusual installation" > is a perfect term. > I tend to disagree. I hardly ever install recommended packages and never see anything break. Missing functionalities are OK, but not breakage. I'm not really against putting xfce4-utils in the "Recommends" field, but it shouldn't break anything. If it breaks anything, then the package should depend on it.
If you really want to put it as a recommended package rather than a dependency, I advise removing the bogus menu entries. Cheers, Xr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org