> In other words: Anyone not installing a "Recommends"
> accepts a small breakage. In this case the breakage is "not
> working menu items". Not good, but "unusual installation"
> is a perfect term.
>   
I tend to disagree. I hardly ever install recommended packages and never
see anything break. Missing functionalities are OK, but not breakage.
I'm not really against putting xfce4-utils in the "Recommends" field,
but it shouldn't break anything. If it breaks anything, then the package
should depend on it.

If you really want to put it as a recommended package rather than a
dependency, I advise removing the bogus menu entries.

Cheers,
Xr



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to