* David Moreno [Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:31:30 -0500]:
>> To get this request move forward, what kind of interest would you like
>> recorded in the bug? From people in the wbadm group, to record our own
>> wish and consensus about using a public role address, or from any
>> other
>> developers, to express if they think having a public role address for
>> wbadm would be a good thing?
> Yes, that's our usual procedure for creating new lists, just collect or
> record other people's interest on the bug and see why it'd be suitable
> for lists.debian.org, etc.
Okay, I'll ask around if people are interested in this going forward,
and whether they'd be interested in saying so in the bug report.
>> This list is to be a role address, so I'd really appreciate if it
>> could
>> be called debian-wbadm, to clearly indicate association with the
>> "wbadm"
>> Unix group. "wanna-build" is the name of a piece of software, and that
>> would not reflect the main intention of the list.
> After discussing it with a couple of other members of the listmaster
> team, we believe that the list would be best suitable if hosted under
> teams.debian.net, which is a service maintained and provided exactly for
> this kind of activities.
> We are unable to find deeper reasons why this list would have to be
> under lists.debian.org, according to the rationale that has been
> provided on the request. So, please consider using teams.d.n.
This is a core infrastructure team, so I believe it should live in a
.org address if at all possible. Because of this, I'd like to ask you
to reconsider.
Thanks for your reply,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
A lie can go round the world before the truth has got its boots on.
-- Terry Pratchett
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
