tags 506689 + wontfix stop On 06.02.09 Ralf Stubner ([email protected]) wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 18:07 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi *, > > > What do people use for the bibliographies nowdays? > > > > > I really, really don't know -- I'm sorry! I'm putting this mail > > back into the BTS. Frank, Norbert, Ralf, Jan: if you have an > > answer please post it here. I guess biblatex is not an > > replacement either... > > No, biblatex works on the formating part, i.e. you no longer have to > hack BST files in reverse polish notation in order to achive certain > effects. > > CrossTeX http://www.cs.cornell.edu/People/egs/crosstex/ might be a > possibility, but I haven't tried it myself. I do remember though that > there has been a discussion on comp.text.tex during the last half year > or so about utf8 and BibTeX. A search on groups.google.com might be > useful. > Final statement: bibtex does actually have not UTF-8 support and probably won't have it soon. :-( For now I'm tagging this bug as won't fix, I suggest to close it. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
