Hi Jeffrey, [email protected] wrote: > On Mar 2, 2009 9:28pm, Thomas Viehmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> it would be nice to have tesseractTrainer.py (in upstream download area, >> but with separate (free, GPL) license and author) and a copy of the >> online HTML docs (eg about training). > > I take your point. What do you suggest > > a. the package > b. the executable > > be called? > > a. tesseract-training, or make it part of the main package? > b. tesseractTrainer? > > We can't leave the .py extension.
So many options. :) Personally, I'd probably look into putting it in the main package and maybe also get rid of the camelCase name. If you are in contact with upstream, maybe they have a suggestion. But really, whatever works for you is good for me as well. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
