* Holger Levsen [Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:42:54 +0100]: > > > [No CC please, thank]
> > This will be done on a best-effort basis. We tend to always CC people on > > -release because it's a role address list, where people who may not be > > subscribed send requests (unblock requests during freezes, coordination > > for library uploads eg. now), and we should make sure they get a copy of > > the answer, exactly the same way they get a copy if the mail to a > > private alias, or to the BTS. > > If you set a M-F-T header, it'll be honoured by at least some of us. > > In this case in particular, another possible way to have done it would > > be avoiding cross-posting altogether, send the initial message to the > > appropriate list (-qa), Bcc'ing -release on it. > > Hope this makes sense to you, > It does, and I appreciate the openness you handle your role-address with! > :-) > But this is not clear from reading http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/ - > so I would also appreciate if this gets clarified there. > (e.g. I'd assume the code of conduct of lists.d.o is valid for this mailing > list as well and not to send cc:s is part of this code.) Ah, sorry for the late follow-up to this bug, but unfortunately the X-Debbugs-Cc in your report had a typo which prevented me from noticing it. To the listmasters: I'll try to provide an updated description for this list at some point in the future, to ease your work. Thanks, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple. -- Oscar Wilde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
