Dixi quod… >I will have to dig out the change which was first applied >then reverted from mksh upstream, to see if this is indeed >what I fear it is.
Okay. I now tested: • mksh R23 (which contained exec.c,v 1.5) • mksh R23 with exec.c,v 1.4 The actual patch came in at revision 1.3 from Debian #71256, and was reverted in mksh R24 (exec.c,v 1.8) due to breaking make(1), as I remembered. Both still exhibit the behaviour shown by mksh-current upon the three one-liners from my previous eMail, so chances are it’s a different bug. I will investigate this further once I have the time. bye, //mirabilos ① https://www.mirbsd.org/cvs.cgi/src/bin/mksh/exec.c#rev1.3 -- [...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be- ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
