Package: binutils-avr
Version: 2.18-4
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20090307 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.

Relevant part:
>  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp a.out unpack-stamp patch-stamp
> # Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
> #-/usr/bin/make clean
> rm -rf src 
> #rm binutils-2.18.tar.bz2 
> dh_clean
>  dpkg-source -b binutils-avr-2.18-4
> dpkg-source: warning: source directory 'binutils-avr-2.18-4' is not 
> <sourcepackage>-<upstreamversion> 'binutils-avr-2.18'
> dpkg-source: info: using source format `1.0'
> dpkg-source: info: building binutils-avr in binutils-avr_2.18-4.tar.gz
> dpkg-source: info: building binutils-avr in binutils-avr_2.18-4.dsc
>  debian/rules build
> tar xjf /usr/src/binutils/binutils-*.tar.bz2
> #tar xjf binutils-2.18.tar.bz2
> mv `ls -d binutils* | grep -v tar` src
> #mkdir build
> touch unpack-stamp
> cd src && for p in ../debian/patches/*.patch; do patch -p0 < $p; done
> patching file bfd/Makefile.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1576 (offset 596 lines).
> patching file binutils/size.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 36 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 69 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 84 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 241 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 251 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 262 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 270 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 302 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 311 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #10 succeeded at 327 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #11 succeeded at 359 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #12 succeeded at 412 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #13 succeeded at 771 (offset -1 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/doc/objcopy.1
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 193 with fuzz 2.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 807 (offset -2 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/Makefile.am
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 97 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 105 (offset -1 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/Makefile.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 133 (offset 4 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 421 (offset 3 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 429 (offset 3 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/bucomm.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 549 (offset 48 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/bucomm.h
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 57 (offset 3 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/budbg.h
> patching file binutils/debug.c
> patching file ./binutils/debug.h
> patching file ./binutils/objcopy.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 32 with fuzz 2.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 271 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 317 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 507 (offset -2 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 955 (offset 37 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 1056 (offset 37 lines).
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 2669 (offset 71 lines).
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 3371 (offset 70 lines).
> patching file ./binutils/rdcoff.c
> patching file ./binutils/wrcoff.c
> patching file ./bfd/Makefile.am
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 391 (offset 2 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1202 with fuzz 2 (offset 12 lines).
> patching file ./bfd/Makefile.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 462 (offset 4 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 645 (offset 6 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1786 with fuzz 2 (offset 16 lines).
> patching file ./bfd/coff-avr.c
> patching file ./bfd/coff-ext-avr.c
> patching file ./bfd/coffcode.h
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 1778 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1813 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 1939 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 2740 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 3543 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #7 succeeded at 3892 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 3970 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #9 succeeded at 4165 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #10 succeeded at 4544 (offset 9 lines).
> Hunk #11 succeeded at 4771 (offset 9 lines).
> patching file ./bfd/coffgen.c
> patching file ./bfd/coffswap.h
> patching file ./bfd/config.bfd
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 328 (offset 1 line).
> patching file ./bfd/configure
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 19626 (offset 592 lines).
> patching file ./bfd/configure.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 619 (offset 7 lines).
> patching file ./bfd/targets.c
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 884 (offset 6 lines).
> patching file ./include/coff/avr.h
> patching file ./include/coff/internal.h
> patching file ld/scripttempl/avr.sc
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr1.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr2.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr3.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr4.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr5.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avr6.sh
> patching file ld/scripttempl/avr.sc
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
> Apply anyway? [n] 
> Skipping patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file binutils/objdump.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 964.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file binutils/objdump.c.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 150.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 58.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 98.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 41.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 41.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 99.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 115.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 49.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 68.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 98.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 328.
> 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
> Apply anyway? [n] 
> Skipping patch.
> 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 103.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 123.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 131.
> 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 44.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 100.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 41.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 147.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 57.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 63.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 103.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 161.
> 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 44.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 60.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file include/opcode/avr.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 40.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/opcode/avr.h.rej
> patching file include/opcode/avr.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 34.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/opcode/avr.h.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 84.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file opcodes/avr-dis.c
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 65.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 180.
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 802 (offset -15 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 924 (offset -15 lines).
> 2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file include/opcode/avr.h
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 30 with fuzz 1.
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 50 with fuzz 2 (offset -5 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 112 (offset 10 lines).
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 173 (offset 10 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 288 (offset 10 lines).
> patching file bfd/archures.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 357 with fuzz 2 (offset 5 lines).
> patching file bfd/cpu-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 86.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file bfd/cpu-avr.c.rej
> patching file include/elf/avr.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 35.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/elf/avr.h.rej
> patching file ld/Makefile.am
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 142 with fuzz 2 (offset 4 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 653 (offset 24 lines).
> patching file ld/Makefile.in
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 393 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 1485 (offset 30 lines).
> patching file ld/configure.tgt
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 107.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/configure.tgt.rej
> patching file ld/emultempl/avrelf.em
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega1.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega2.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega3.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega4.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega5.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega6.sh
> patching file ld/emulparams/avrxmega7.sh
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 172.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 60.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 172.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 60.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 174.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 60.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file include/opcode/avr.h
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 41.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/opcode/avr.h.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 116.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file gas/doc/c-avr.texi
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 45.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file gas/doc/c-avr.texi.rej
> patching file include/opcode/avr.h
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
> Apply anyway? [n] 
> Skipping patch.
> 2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file include/opcode/avr.h.rej
> patching file gas/config/tc-avr.c
> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
> Apply anyway? [n] 
> Skipping patch.
> 3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file gas/config/tc-avr.c.rej
> patching file bfd/elf32-avr.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 2034.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file bfd/elf32-avr.c.rej
> make: *** [patch-stamp] Error 1

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/03/07/binutils-avr_2.18-4_lsid32.buildlog

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems.


-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [email protected]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [email protected]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to