> That is something I could try, but I might prefer to list all arches
> manually. After all, the arches should not change every other day?

-1

The most time-consuming, error-prone and tedious part of the armel
port was identifying all the packages that had
[long-list-of-arches-except-one-or-two] and contacting the maintainers
to make a trivial fix, as well as having a latency of months.
The -N suggestion is a good thing for all future ports (as well as
being a case of saying what you mean, rather than not saying what you
don't mean :)



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to