On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:19:36AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > > Line 231: Actual SNR ( 58.7) > target SNR (-31.0). > > > > Line 231: Actual SNR ( 57.4) > target SNR (-31.0). > > > > Line 279: Actual SNR ( 59.3) > target SNR (-29.0). > > > > Line 231: Actual SNR ( 0.0) > target SNR (-31.0). > > Actually, looking at this some more, the failure on Arm (0.0) > was vastly different that the one on the other architectures > suggesting that the Arm bug is different. > > > It would be nice if this could be reduces to a simple c file that > > shows the problem. It would simplify testing it on all the > > arches. This would also help to submit it to the gcc bugtracker > > if it's a bug in gcc. > > I'll see if I can come up with a suitable standalone test program > for the Arm case. > > For the others, I am still pretty sure that this is a bug that > has been fixed in vorbis SVN. If I could get access to one of > these machine I could test it. > > > Any Debian Developer should be able to test all those arches on Debian > > porter machines. > > I'm not a DD, but I'm on my way to becoming a DM. I have already had > my GPG key signed by two DDs who will vouch for me and I know at least > a couple more who would do the same :-).
DMs don't get access. But I can run any test you want. > > But we'll probably need to ask to install all > > the required packages first. > > All thats needed is build-essentials and the SVN and Bzr clients. I atleast needed libogg-dev to be able to build it. It probably also required automake/autoconf. Not that anything should be a problem. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
