Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
>> Apparently noone objected to the wish itself.
>
> Well, not all bugs have proper response/analysis due to the high number of
> bugs that we handle. Sorry for that, it doesn't mean that every wishlist is
> correct and makes sense.
>
>> The attached patch implements it. Could it be incorporated into the next
>> dpkg?
>
> Not until you have explained what this would be used for.
>
> The right way to include a field in the .deb is to use
> fields named "XB-*". What doesn't work with such fields that would
> require this patch ?
Let me put it this way:
Make the X-<field> default to mean the same as XB-<field>,
where field is included in the binary package.
Jari
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
