On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:19, Deng Xiyue <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:54:54AM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:37, Deng Xiyue >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:37:28AM +0800, LI Daobing wrote: >> >> my 2cent: scim-python is (somehow) orphaned by upstream author, he is >> >> working on a similar project named ibus: >> >> http://code.google.com/p/ibus/ >> >> >> > >> > If that is the case, I guess scim-python is candidate for orphan or >> > removal. >> > >> > Meanwhile, ITP/RFS for ibus will be appreciated. >> > >> tegaki is on the way, it is based on scim-python (a handwriting input method) >> ref: http://tinyurl.com/dkusa9 >> > > Are tegaki upstream aware of the fact that scim-python has a dead > upstream? They are better informed so they might decide to migrate to > ibus instead of depending on an obsoleted component.
I don't think scim-python is dead, it's just been orphaned. > >> ibus 0.1 is maintained in >> https://launchpad.net/~lidaobing/+archive/ppa/ (part of them already >> get into ubuntu 9.04) >> ibus 1.1 is maintained in https://launchpad.net/~ibus-dev/+archive/ppa/ >> the debian new queue is too long, and it's hard to find a sponsor, and >> the upstream is still release new version frequently, so I did not >> file a RFS on debian-mentors >> > > I'd bet foka will help to sponsor, though he is very busy these days, > and the NEW queue quarantine will be uneasy anyway. > I'll contact foka in this weekend. -- Best Regards LI Daobing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
