On Friday 27 March 2009 10:16:15 am Enrico Tassi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 09:52:03AM -0400, a_indabronx wrote: > > Package: freepops > > Version: 0.2.9-2 > > Severity: normal > > > > --- Please enter the report below this line. --- > > > > When I installed freepops, freepops-updater-dialog (included in the > > freepops package) did not work because I did not have dialog installed, > > and the freepops package did not require it. > > Freepops suggests dialog, since it is not strictly necessary to run > freepops, but just the interactive updater. > > Maybe recommends is more appropriate here, but I'm reluctant to add a > real dependency. Moreover, splitting the package is bad eaither, since > the freepops-updater-dialog package whould just contain one file. > > Are you OK with a recommends dependency (means that most package manager > will install it by default)? > > Cheers
I think your compromise is good. Since the web-mail services change their interfaces frequently, freepops is not very useful without regular updates of its modules. Thank you! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
