Hello! On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 12:42:30PM +0000, Yevgeny Kosarzhevsky wrote: > shouldn't that fix be included in Lenny fix, as they are using libxt > already?
Should? *If* /someone/ backports the fix to the lenny version of iproute, we could *ask* the release team *if* they would allow us to update the Stable/Lenny version. > Otherwise iproute2 remains broken in Lenny Broken, no. Some functionality missing, yes. Personally I'm in doubt if it's worth it. If anyone needs functionality that is not included in the Lenny version (being tc filter action ipt or anything else!), then building the sid (or pkg-iproute git repo!) version on Lenny should work out of the box and would be what I'd recommend. (If anyone is not comfortable with dpkg-buildpackage, feel free to ask me.) A complete backport is not suitable to enter the stable release though, as stable means stable and Debian doesn't accept any *potential* risks of regressions that "unneccesary" changes means. -- Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
