On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:01:00PM +0200, Alexander Kurtz wrote: > ltsp-server-standalone does depend on ndb-server AND on > nfs-kernel-server. However most people use only one of them and end up > with one useless server programm installed. > > If you're using NFS this isn't that serious, since NBD has to be > explicitly configured in /etc/inetd.conf. But NBD-users (like me) do > have an unnecessary NFS-Server running.
nbd also is needed to support NBD swap. the intention of the ltsp-server-standalone package is to have *all* functionality available. > Yes, I do realise that I could just install ltsp-server plus a dhcp > server but I do actually like the comfort of only one package, and I > don't see why both must be depencies. users using NBD root wouldn't strictly need nfs-kernel-server at all, i want to have a single package to install to ensure that the defaults for Debian's ltsp to work. i'd rather err on the side of ltsp-server-standalone pulling in a little bit too much for non-default scenarios than the other way around. as you say, you can always install ltsp-server and whatever dependencies you want. live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
