On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:54:30PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > Indeed, the code checks for size >= (off_t)0xffffffff. I have no idea > whether the code is wrong or the error message is wrong - is there a > reason for the real limit to be 0xfffffffe? Wouldn't surprise me, > there are some strange things in iso9660 land.
I haven't the slightest clue which one is right. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
